Bayes Group
← All Insights
·8 min read

Where Asia macro PMs landed after the March 2026 Iran-rates drawdown

The week of March 9 2026 produced one of the cleanest single-week senior-macro-PM drawdowns of the past three years. Three months on, the recalibration pattern across the Asia-anchored macro cohort is visible enough to write about. The mobility signal underneath the drawdown, not the drawdown itself, is the part worth reading.

The week of March 9 2026 produced one of the cleanest single-week senior-macro-PM drawdowns of the past three years. The Iran-conflict-driven rates whiplash caught Citadel, Balyasny, Millennium, and Point72 mid-position; Bloomberg covered the drawdowns at the time and the trade press has been reading the rebound since. Three months on, the recalibration pattern across the Asia-anchored macro cohort is visible enough to write about. The piece that interests me is not the drawdown itself — that part is already discounted into the comp cycle — but the mobility signal underneath it. Asia macro PMs who watched the March week are moving differently from the ones who watched the same week from London or NY desks.

The structural fact: Asia time-zone macro PMs took the drawdown with less position-correlation than their London and NY counterparts, because the Asia desk runs the Tokyo and Singapore session before the European event-driven dispersion compounds. That timing asymmetry is now reading as a hiring-side advantage on the recruiter side of multiple multi-strat platforms. The cohort being recruited from has narrowed, which makes the names that are actually available right now more identifiable.

The four-PM bench under the Choy pod build

The Balyasny Choy-pod build is the single cleanest comparable for what's happening across the Asia macro hiring lane. Ron Choy joined BAM in October 2025 from Brevan Howard with a $30M package, building out a four-person Tokyo and Singapore yen-rates pod. Bloomberg carried the announcement; the structural reading at the time was that BAM was making the most aggressive single bet on Asia rates the firm had committed to in recent memory. Seven months later, what is more interesting is not the Choy pod itself — that bet was already on the table — but the layer underneath it.

The Asia FXO and rates senior cohort that BAM is now drawing from sits across the senior cross-platform layer: operators across the 2018-2023 Goldman Sachs HK FX options era, ex-Brevan Howard Singapore and Hong Kong macro operators across the post-Asia-build window, ex-Citadel GQS Asia-rates traders, and a sub-layer of single-platform-tenure senior PMs at HK boutiques that had been running anchor books with materially less mobility through 2024. The March 2026 week opened the bottom of that cohort meaningfully. Specifically: the boutique-anchor PMs with multi-year single-platform tenure who watched the March drawdown from the outside (no direct position exposure, but reading the impact on platform-tier comp cycles) are now showing materially higher inbound recruiter response than they were in Q4 2025.

The Brevan ADGM diaspora as the structural other half

The Brevan Howard ADGM build that ran from 2023-2025 produced a senior macro alumni cohort that the rest of the market has been recruiting from steadily since the Lahsini departure in early 2025. That cohort is mostly Singapore- and Hong-Kong-anchored macro PMs who carry the Brevan-discretionary-style book shape; the cleanest comparable in the past 12 months was Lewis Morton's Eisler-to-Taula move in August 2025, which sits at a slightly different point on the rates-RV spectrum but reads from the same recruiting-side angle.

Three months after the March 2026 drawdown, the Brevan ADGM diaspora is showing two visible mobility patterns. First, a sub-cohort of mid-tenure operators (3-5 years at Brevan ADGM) is now actively step-out-evaluating in a way that wasn't visible at the start of Q1 2026 — the March week functioned as an information shock that reset expectations about whether the platform-tier or the single-anchor seat is more comp-stable across a discontinuity. Second, the senior-tier (7+ years at Brevan, or carrying a $1B+ book) is moving more selectively, and the few who are moving are taking exclusively named-platform offers from the partnership-tier macro firms rather than testing the more crowded multi-PM lanes.

The two pieces together explain why the macro hiring cycle through May-June 2026 feels both very busy and very narrow. Busy at the mid-tenure operator layer; narrow at the senior-architect layer. The recruiter signal across both layers is currently pointing toward HK and Singapore as the geographies where the supply is real, and toward Dubai and Abu Dhabi as the geographies where the platform-tier demand is most active.

What the Tudor London build is signaling

Tudor's London chapter post-Anderson is the cleanest demand-side comparable. David Anderson came across from Millennium in 2024 to build out the London macro discretionary architecture, and the 10 New Burlington Street office shaping up alongside the FY-Mar-25 step ($198M revenue from $143M, $8.5M average per partner from $6.6M, 118 staff from 101) reads as the most committed London chapter Tudor has run in some time. Three months after the Iran-rates drawdown, Tudor's recruiter signal across the senior-Asia-macro cohort is louder than it has been since the 2023 wave that brought Anderson over in the first place.

The pattern: London-architecture senior macro PMs who watched the March 2026 week from a US or European desk are being offered Tudor-build seats with material capital allocations as part of the package. The Anderson-architecture is reading as multi-decade-discretionary-discipline, which is exactly the shape the Brevan ADGM diaspora senior tier maps cleanly into. The cohort overlap between PMs Tudor is now actively recruiting and PMs Brevan ADGM is losing to platform-tier offers is high and visible.

The Taula Year-2 read as the harder comparable

Taula is the harder comparable because the firm is in a Year-2-build cycle that is genuinely capital-and-bench-scaling-together — the rare ordering. The seven-person trading-team lift from Millennium in February 2026, alongside the $1.75bn raise from existing investors landing on top of $8.5bn AUM, sits underneath the post-March-drawdown read with more nuance than the Tudor signal does. The bet there is that the senior bench needs to be in place before the next platform-build wave breaks; the March 2026 week confirmed that timing more than it confirmed anyone else's.

The seven-trader pod, alongside the Lewis Morton bond-basis franchise and the EU-rates desk additions, together represent the most aggressive single-firm senior-macro architecture in the Year-2 cycle. Three months after the March drawdown, the question across the macro recruiter cohort is not whether Taula will add a senior layer on top of the existing pod — it's whether the firm will take the post-drawdown opportunity to lock in a senior-architect-tier name (the kind of seat that historically Brevan ADGM or Tudor would have filled) before Q3 2026.

What this means for the next 90 days

The senior Asia macro PM cohort that is actually in motion right now sits in three sub-layers. The first is the boutique-anchor PMs with multi-year single-platform tenure who watched the March 2026 week from outside the position-exposure window and are now in the early-evaluation phase of a step-out conversation; that cohort is meaningfully wider than it was at the start of Q1 2026, and the recruiter-side inbound on this layer is unusually active. The second is the Brevan ADGM mid-tenure diaspora that is actively step-out-evaluating; that sub-cohort is the most concentrated single supply of senior Asia macro operators on the market through Q3 2026. The third is the platform-tier senior architects who are selectively reachable, and those names are being competed for at the partnership-tier altitude rather than the multi-strat-platform-pod altitude.

The geography is more lopsided than the firm-side commentary suggests. Hong Kong and Singapore together carry a substantial majority of the names that are actually reachable; Tokyo and Dubai carry the rest. The London demand side is real but is mostly looking for relocate-to-London arrangements from the Asia base, which is a meaningfully different recruiter-side problem than the cleaner US-anchored seat moves.

For platform firms running senior Asia macro builds: the cohort that watched the March 2026 drawdown without direct position exposure (boutique anchors, Brevan ADGM mid-tenure operators outside the desk that took the drawdown) is the cohort that's most actionable through Q3 2026. The cohort that is least actionable is the senior-architect tier; that name set will move, but slowly, and through partnership-tier introductions rather than direct outreach.

For firms running senior Asia rates desks: the Tokyo and Singapore session asymmetry is reading as a real edge on the recruiting side this cycle. Single-platform-tenured senior FX-options and rates PMs anchored in HK or Singapore are the supply curve worth screening hardest right now.

Richard Haddad, Bayes Group. Bayes maps senior PM, options, and quant-research talent across NY, HK, London, Singapore, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Sydney.

Bayes Group

Ready to discuss a mandate?

We work with a small number of firms at any time.